Differences between digital payments in B2B and B2C scenarios in Indonesia

Analysing the key differences between digital payments in Indonesia in B2B and B2C scenarios

Introduction: overview of the digital payments market in Indonesia

Indonesia, the largest digital economy in Southeast Asia, has seen explosive growth in its digital payments market in recent years. According to the latest data, Indonesia has more than 160 million e-wallet users, and the country's digital payments market is expected to reach $95 billion by 2025. Against this fast-growing backdrop, understanding the differences between digital payments in B2B (business-to-business) and B2C (business-to-consumer) scenarios is critical for businesses and financial service providers.

Basic Concepts Distinguishing B2B and B2C Transactions

Differences in business naturedetermines the difference in payment needs between the two transaction models. At the definitional level:

  • B2C (Business-to-Consumer) refers to the sale of products or services directly to the final consumer by a business
  • B2B (Business-to-Business) is a business-to-business commercial transaction.

This fundamental difference leads to significant differences in a range of payment characteristics, from the amount and frequency of transactions to the method of settlement.

Comparative analysis of transaction size and frequency

Typical features of B2C payments

  • Smaller individual amounts: Usually between tens and hundreds of thousands of rupiahs (approximately a few dollars to a few tens of dollars).
  • High-frequency consumption: Consumers may use mobile payments to purchase goods or services multiple times a day
  • High immediacy requirements: Users expect to complete payment and receive goods/services in real time
  • Seasonal fluctuations are evident: Highly affected by holidays and promotions

Salient features of B2B payments

  • Significant financial flows: Single transactions can run into hundreds of millions or even billions of rupiahs.
  • Low frequency but regular: Periodic settlement (e.g., monthly) according to the contract cycle
  • Complex approval process: Often involves multiple levels of authorisation and financial review mechanisms

Differences in payment methods and channel preferences

Common options for B2C digital payments

In the B2C scenario in Indonesia, consumers prefer to use convenient and fast payment tools, mainly including:

  • Electronic Wallet (E-Wallet): such as GoPay, OVO, DANA, etc., dominate the market and are particularly suitable for small, high-frequency transactions.
  • Two-dimensional code payment (QRIS): A unified standard QR code payment system promoted by Bank Indonesia, widely used for offline retail and small merchants.
  • Bank Transfer: Complete instant transfers via mobile banking or ATM.
  • BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later) Service: such as Akulaku and Kredivo are popular among young consumers.

These approaches emphasise the fluidity of the user experience and often support one-click payments or biometric authentication (fingerprint/facial recognition).

Typical models for B2B digital payments

In contrast, business-to-business transactions focus more on security, traceability and the ability to manage large sums of money:

  • Enterprise Internet Banking / API Direct Connect Banking System--Large companies usually directly interface with commercial banks' corporate accounts for bulk payments and collections.
  • Virtual Account (VA)-Vendor generates a unique VA number for each customer for easy reconciliation and management of accounts receivable.
  • Letter of Credit & Factoring Services (LC & Factoring)-Common in international trade or long-term supply chain co-operation to reduce credit risk.
  • Phased billing & period management tool (Net 30/60) --Many wholesalers use deferred payment models and rely on ERP-integrated financial software to automate the billing cycle.

Due to the large amounts of money involved and strict compliance requirements, B-end users are less likely to use personal e-wallets and instead rely on specialised fintech solutions such as Jurnal.id or Mekari's integrated accounting + payments platform.


Comparison of security and risk control strategies

B2C: Fraud Prevention and Conversion Rate Balance Point

The following are the main challenges in online transactions for consumers.

  1. risk of fraudulent swiping-Unauthorised purchases by unscrupulous people using phishing websites to steal card information;
  2. suspicion of money launderingPart of the grey industry laundering money through large numbers of small top-ups.
    3 .Chargeback disputes -Buyer may initiate a credit card chargeback if he/she is not satisfied with the product, resulting in a loss to the seller.

The Platform has therefore taken the following measures.
✅ Real-time risk control engine scanning for abnormal behaviour (e.g. multiple orders from the same IP within a short period of time)
✅ Setting of single day/single transaction limits reduces the scope of potential losses
✅ Introducing 3DS authentication to enhance identity verification but care needs to be taken to avoid adding friction to lost customers


B2B environments: compliance audits and enterprise-level assurance needs

Because of the far-reaching impact of each transaction, corporate clients take it very seriously.

🔹 Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Screening - Must comply with the large value reporting thresholds set by Bank Indonesia BI (usually over 500 million IDR requires additional review).
🔹 Multi-level approval authority - The CFO or finance team may need confirmation from multiple people to release the money ;)
🔹 Full audit trail functionality (Audit Trail)All operation records are tamper-proof for tax verification.

In addition, B-side payment gateways often provide APIs for internal ERP systems to directly call the data to achieve automated reconciliation to reduce the probability of manual error.